2026 Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Visit

On this page:

ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ the Comprehensive Visit 

The conducts a comprehensive visit once every ten years to confirm that institutions on the Standard Pathway meet the , comply with , and are pursuing continuous institutional improvement.  

A team of peer reviewers assigned by HLC will visit ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ on April 20-21, 2026, for our next Comprehensive Visit. The visit will require engagement from the entire ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ community, including students, faculty, staff, and the Board of Trustees. Team members will also visit the Lake Campus during their visit. 

HLC will evaluate the institution at all levels to ensure that ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ meets the highest standards of quality and that our programs and services meet the expectations of both our students and the broader educational community.

Please direct any questions about the Comprehensive Visit to Nick Christian, Director of Assessment & Chief Accreditation Officer. You can also consult the slides.


Assurance Argument

In preparation for the April 20-21 Comprehensive Evaluation, the following documents were submitted to the Higher Learning Commission. The Visit Team will review the documents to prepare for their visit.  

±·°¿°Õ·¡: Evidence file links within the reports do not work because the evidence files are stored in HLC's Canopy System. 


Open Forums

Three open forums will be hosted by the Visit Team on April 20, allowing the campus community to interact and share their perspectives on ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ with Visit Team members.

  • Criterion 1 & 2: 1:30–2:15 p.m. in 163 Rike Hall
    • Criterion 1 – Mission  
    • Criterion 2 – Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct   
  • Criterion 3: 1:30–2:15 p.m. in 166 Rike Hall  
    • Criterion 3 – Teaching and Learning for Student Success  
  • Criterion 4: 3:20–3:50 p.m. in 166 Rike Hall 
    • Criterion 4 – Sustainability: Institutional Effectiveness, Resources, and Planning  

Visit Team Schedule

The following schedule was established by the Visit Team. Those whose attendance is required have received meeting invitations via email with details on location and how to prepare for the conversations. 

Monday, April 20, 2026–Dayton Campus

Time Session / Topic
8:15 a.m. President’s Council
9 a.m. Finances & Budgeting (Criterion 1)
9 a.m. Broad Overview of Teaching & Learning (Criterion 3)
10 a.m. Mission, Strategic and Integrated Planning (Criteria 1 & 4)
10 a.m. Sufficiency of Faculty and Staff, Support for Learning, & Resources for Teaching (Criterion 3)
11 a.m. Infrastructure and Resources, including HR, IT, and Physical Plant (Criterion 4)
11 a.m. Assessment and Program Reviews (Criterion 3)
12:30 p.m. Board of Trustees
1:30 p.m. Open Forums (see above)
2:30 p.m. Enrollment Management, Planning, and Student Success
3:20 p.m. Faculty Senate Executive Committee
3:20 p.m. Open Forum (see above)
4 p.m. College Deans
5:15 p.m. Daily Wrap Up

Tuesday, April 21, 2026–Dayton Campus

Time Session / Topic
8 a.m. Mission & Diversity of Society (Criterion 1.B)
9 a.m. Public Good & Civic Engagement (Criterion 1.C)
9 a.m. Graduate and Professional Education (Criteria 2, 3, & 4)
9:50 a.m. Research and Academic Freedom (Criterion 2)
9:50 a.m. Shared Governance
10:45 a.m. Campus Tour
11:45 a.m. Closing Session

Tuesday, April 21, 2026–Lake Campus

Time Session / Topic
9 a.m. Planning & Governance
9:30 a.m. Facilities & Technology
10 a.m. Faculty & Staff Qualifications, Support, Hiring, Training
10:30 a.m. Campus Tour
11 a.m. Student Resources & Support, Academics, Advising, Records
11 a.m. Evaluations, Assessment, Continuous Improvement
12 p.m. Instructional Capacity and Delivery of Programs

Assurance Argument Writing Team

Writing Team Coordination 

 

Criterion 1: Mission 

ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´â€™s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institution’s operations. 

Team Leads

 

Criterion 2: Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct 

In fulfilling its mission, ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical and responsible. 

Team Leads

 

Criterion 3: Teaching and Learning for Student Success 

ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs, learning environments and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness in fulfilling its mission. The rigor and quality of each educational program is consistent regardless of modality, location or other differentiating factors.

Team Leads

 
 

Criterion 4: Sustainability: Institutional Effectiveness, Resources and Planning 

ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´â€™s resources, structures, policies, procedures and planning enable it to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its educational programs, and respond to future challenges and opportunities. 

Team Leads 

 

Federal Compliance 

ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ complies with federal requirements, specifically: 

  1. Assignment of credits, program length, and tuition 
  2. Institutional mechanisms for handling student complaints 
  3. Publication of transfer policies 
  4. Practices for verification of student identity 
  5. Protection of student privacy 
  6. Publication of student outcomes data 
  7. Standing with state and other accrediting agencies 
  8. Recruiting, admissions and related enrollment practices 

Team Leads

 

Assumed Practices 

ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ affirmatively demonstrates compliance with assumed practices that are (1) generally matters to be determined as facts, rather than matters requiring professional judgment and (2) not expected to vary by institutional mission or context. 

Team Leads 

 

Campus Involvement 

Members of the writing team may reach out to ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´ faculty and staff to provide specific information on sections of the report. Additionally, there will be opportunities throughout the 2025-26 academic year to review and provide feedback on drafts of the Assurance Argument before its submission to HLC in March 2026.  

If you have questions about the Comprehensive Visit or the Assurance Argument, please contact Nick Christian.